GCSEs haven’t been very successful since
their introduction because it is impossible to have single exam to cater for
all abilities and there have been problems regarding their veracity. Any future
plans will need to be based on a suite of qualifications catering for the many
different pathways that students might want to follow. In my opinion, GCSEs may
be slimmed down to allow pupils to cover more subjects for the current GCSEs
can only let schools fit a limited number into the curriculum. Now most
curriculum time is given over to examinable subjects and students have to make
invidious choices between subjects since they cannot do everything, as many
pupils are attending classes or education online
to improve their academic skills. If we reduced the number of slots, students
could study to a similar depth but in fewer topics.
![]() |
| The Future of GCSEs |
Children develop at different rates and
different ages. They need to be free to step up or step down to suit their
abilities as they develop. We do need to consider the different subject
content, learning styles, home environments and contextual characteristics of
students when designing assessment methodologies. The vast majority of young
people now stay in education or training until they are 18. We don’t need a
school-leaving certificate for 16-year-olds. Instead, we need a general test at
14 to check student progress and help guide subject choices. After that,
students should combine academic and hands-on subjects and earn credits towards
a high school diploma at 18.
Anyway,
different people have different opinions on this hot topic, but GCSEs is really
important. It can be changed or improved, but you should not expect it to be
instead. To focus your attention or energy on your academic, it will not be a tough
thing to you.

No comments:
Post a Comment